{"id":956,"date":"2026-05-29T03:32:22","date_gmt":"2026-05-29T03:32:22","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/asianewscast.com\/2026\/05\/29\/rethinking-the-absolute-bar-on-scheduled-caste-status-in-india\/"},"modified":"2026-05-29T03:32:22","modified_gmt":"2026-05-29T03:32:22","slug":"rethinking-the-absolute-bar-on-scheduled-caste-status-in-india","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.asianewscast.com\/?p=956","title":{"rendered":"Rethinking the \u2018Absolute Bar\u2019 on Scheduled Caste Status in India"},"content":{"rendered":"<figure id=\"td-story-image\" class=\"td-media td-media--story\">\n<div class=\"td-img\"><img decoding=\"async\" alt=\"Rethinking the \u2018Absolute Bar\u2019 on Scheduled Caste Status in India\" title=\"Rethinking the \u2018Absolute Bar\u2019 on Scheduled Caste Status in India\" src=\"https:\/\/thediplomat.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/05\/sizes\/td-story-s-1\/thediplomat_2026-05-28-235618.jpg\"><\/div><figcaption class=\"td-caption\">\n<p>Compared to affirmative action in the U.S. and South Africa, India\u2019s religion-linked approach to caste recognition stands out as an exception.<\/p>\n<p><span>Credit: <a href=\"https:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Dalit_History_Month#\/media\/File:DalitHistoryMonth_April15Editathon_05.jpg\" target=\"_blank\">Wikimedia Commons \/ Zhengan<\/a><\/span><\/figcaption><\/figure>\n<section id=\"tda-gated-body\" class=\"td-23-story-body td-prose tda-gated tda-gated--locked\" data-pid=\"p309625\">\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400\">When India\u2019s Supreme Court <\/span><a href=\"https:\/\/www.scobserver.in\/journal\/caste-identity-after-religious-conversion-who-counts-as-a-schedule-caste-person\/\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400\">reiterated<\/span><\/a><span style=\"font-weight: 400\"> that the exclusion of Dalit converts from <\/span><a href=\"https:\/\/socialjustice.gov.in\/writereaddata\/UploadFile\/CONSTITUTION%20(SC)%20ORDER%201950%20dated%2010081950.pdf\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400\">Scheduled Caste<\/span><\/a><span style=\"font-weight: 400\"> (SC) status is \u201cabsolute and admits no exception,\u201d it did more than settle a doctrinal question. <\/span><span style=\"font-weight: 400\">It revived a foundational constitutional dilemma: can the law deny protection against caste-based discrimination simply because an individual has changed religion? More critically, does caste itself disappear upon conversion, or does the law merely choose not to see it? <\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400\">This tension between constitutional text and social reality lies at the heart of the debate on SC status for converts to Islam and Christianity.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400\">The legal position rests on Clause 3 of the <\/span><a href=\"https:\/\/socialjustice.gov.in\/writereaddata\/UploadFile\/CONSTITUTION%20(SC)%20ORDER%201950%20dated%2010081950.pdf\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400\">Constitution (Scheduled Castes) Order, 1950<\/span><\/a><span style=\"font-weight: 400\">. Originally limited to Hindus, and later extended to Sikhs and Buddhists, the Order continues to exclude Muslims and Christians. The Supreme Court has consistently read this provision strictly: SC status is a matter of legal recognition, not lived identity.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400\">A Dalit who converts to Christianity or Islam immediately loses access to reservations, scholarships, and protections under the <\/span><a href=\"https:\/\/www.indiacode.nic.in\/bitstream\/123456789\/15338\/1\/scheduled_castes_and_the_scheduled_tribes.pdf\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400\">SC\/ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989<\/span><\/a><span style=\"font-weight: 400\">. The court has clarified that this bar is categorical \u2013\u00a0 possessing an SC certificate is irrelevant if the individual no longer professes a qualifying religion.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400\">This formal clarity sits uneasily with empirical reality. NCRB data shows that tens of thousands of atrocities against Scheduled Castes are registered each year, with <\/span><a href=\"https:\/\/www.pib.gov.in\/PressReleasePage.aspx?PRID=2197828&amp;reg=3&amp;lang=2\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400\">pendency rates<\/span><\/a><span style=\"font-weight: 400\"> exceeding 85 percent. Caste-based violence remains a <\/span><a href=\"https:\/\/www.sciencedirect.com\/science\/article\/pii\/S0305750X18301943\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400\">structural feature<\/span><\/a><span style=\"font-weight: 400\"> of Indian society.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400\">Sociological studies further demonstrate that caste does not vanish upon conversion. Millions of Dalit Christians and Dalit Muslims continue to face social segregation, occupational immobility, and endogamy mirroring caste hierarchies within Hindu society. Yet they remain largely invisible in state policy. The result is a paradox: the law recognizes caste within certain religions but denies its existence when it crosses religious boundaries.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400\">The constitutional validity of Clause 3 has been <\/span><a href=\"https:\/\/www.scobserver.in\/journal\/caste-identity-after-religious-conversion-who-counts-as-a-schedule-caste-person\/\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400\">pending<\/span><\/a><span style=\"font-weight: 400\"> before the Supreme Court since 2004. Meanwhile, multiple institutional exercises have pointed toward the need for reconsideration. The <\/span><a href=\"https:\/\/economictimes.indiatimes.com\/news\/india\/sc-status-cant-be-given-to-dalits-who-converted-to-islam-christianity-centre-to-sc\/articleshow\/96063539.cms?utm_source=contentofinterest&amp;utm_medium=text&amp;utm_campaign=cppst&amp;fbclid=IwY2xjawRpKypleHRuA2FlbQIxMQBicmlkETF2T0V3MGVPR0FVdjI1VkJqc3J0YwZhcHBfaWQQMjIyMDM5MTc4ODIwMDg5MgABHjlyrDOw7x86INdbzXWiny0jw7fWOTKHaBtpozAu-nevUVscQReZJZIwSeJY_aem_olLs2skut4ktk-mMcaXEVA\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400\">Ranganath Mishra Commission<\/span><\/a><span style=\"font-weight: 400\"> (2007) recommended making SC status religion-neutral, finding no empirical basis for exclusion. The <\/span><a href=\"https:\/\/prsindia.org\/files\/policy\/policy_committee_reports\/1242304423--Summary%20of%20Sachar%20Committee%20Report.pdf\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400\">Sachar Committee<\/span><\/a><span style=\"font-weight: 400\"> and subsequent studies reinforced this conclusion, documenting persistent discrimination among converts.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400\">In 2022, the Union government constituted a <\/span><a href=\"https:\/\/www.livelaw.in\/top-stories\/scheduled-caste-status-for-converted-dalits-centre-constitutes-commission-to-examine-the-issue-211078?fromIpLogin=35338.24553993454\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400\">Commission of Inquiry under former Chief Justice K G Balakrishnan<\/span><\/a><span style=\"font-weight: 400\"> to examine whether SC status should be extended to Dalit converts. However, the commission has not submitted its report. Its deadline has been extended to April 2026, prolonging uncertainty for millions.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400\">What is striking is not just policy delay but judicial silence. The Supreme Court\u2019s reaffirmation of the \u201cabsolute bar\u201d does not engage with the pending constitutional challenge, the Balakrishnan Commission, or the Mishra Commission\u2019s findings. Nor does it revisit <\/span><a href=\"https:\/\/clpr.org.in\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/12\/68.-Soosai_and_Ors_vs_Union_of_India_UOI_and_Ors_30091s850045COM491990.pdf\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400\">Soosai v. Union of India<\/span><\/a><span style=\"font-weight: 400\"> (1985), where the Court acknowledged that resolving this issue requires contemporary socio-economic evidence.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400\">Instead, in <\/span><a href=\"https:\/\/www.business-standard.com\/india-news\/religious-conversion-to-avail-reservation-a-fraud-on-constitution-sc-124112700458_1.html\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400\">C Selvarani<\/span><\/a><span style=\"font-weight: 400\"> (2024), the court characterized claims to SC status after conversion as a \u201cfraud on the Constitution.\u201d Together, these developments suggest not just doctrinal continuity but a narrowing of legal space at a time when evidence points toward reconsideration.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400\">The constitutional difficulty is clear. <\/span><a href=\"https:\/\/thelawmatics.in\/articles-14-15-and-16-equality-code-of-constitution\/\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400\">Articles 14, 15, and 16<\/span><\/a><span style=\"font-weight: 400\"> permit affirmative action to remedy historical disadvantage. But if caste-based disadvantage persists irrespective of religion, excluding Dalit converts risks making the classification under-inclusive.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400\">The question is not whether affirmative action can differentiate, but whether it can do so while ignoring social reality. A religion-based exclusion begins to resemble constitutional evasion rather than reasonable classification.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400\">There is also a quieter constitutional cost. <\/span><a href=\"https:\/\/indiankanoon.org\/doc\/631708\/\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400\">Article 25<\/span><\/a><span style=\"font-weight: 400\"> guarantees the freedom to profess, practise, and propagate religion. Yet when conversion leads to the loss of legal protections and socio-economic safeguards, that freedom becomes conditional.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400\">The law does not prohibit conversion, but it does penalizes it. The price of changing religion is the forfeiture of constitutional benefits, even if the underlying disadvantage remains unchanged.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400\">The Supreme Court\u2019s position has been consistent, if cautious. In <\/span><a href=\"https:\/\/clpr.org.in\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/12\/68.-Soosai_and_Ors_vs_Union_of_India_UOI_and_Ors_30091s850045COM491990.pdf\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400\">Soosai v. Union of India<\/span><\/a><span style=\"font-weight: 400\"> (1985), it upheld the exclusion of Christian converts due to insufficient evidence of continued backwardness. In <\/span><a href=\"https:\/\/api.sci.gov.in\/jonew\/judis\/9653.pdf\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400\">S Anbalagan v. B Devarajan<\/span><\/a><span style=\"font-weight: 400\"> (1984), it acknowledged that caste may persist after conversion but stopped short of extending benefits. In <\/span><a href=\"https:\/\/indiankanoon.org\/doc\/853334\/\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400\">C M Arumugam v. S Rajgopal<\/span><\/a><span style=\"font-weight: 400\"> (1976), it recognised that caste identity can revive upon reconversion, implicitly admitting that caste is not erased by religious change.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400\">In <\/span><a href=\"https:\/\/indiankanoon.org\/doc\/1215698\/\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400\">State of Kerala v. Chandramohanan<\/span><\/a><span style=\"font-weight: 400\"> (2004), it reaffirmed that SC status is governed strictly by the Presidential Order under Article 341. Even in <\/span><a href=\"https:\/\/www.casemine.com\/judgement\/in\/5790b23de561097e45a4e20c\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400\">K P Manu v. Chairman, Scrutiny Committee<\/span><\/a><span style=\"font-weight: 400\"> (2015), while allowing restoration of caste status after reconversion, the Court maintained the rigid framework linking SC recognition to specified religions.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400\">These decisions reveal a consistent judicial pattern: acknowledgment that caste may endure beyond religion, combined with reluctance to extend constitutional protection accordingly. The recent reaffirmation of the \u201cabsolute bar\u201d reflects fidelity to statutory text but also institutional hesitation to engage with evolving social evidence.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400\">The consequences are tangible. Dalit converts are excluded from protections under the <\/span><a href=\"https:\/\/www.indiacode.nic.in\/bitstream\/123456789\/15338\/1\/scheduled_castes_and_the_scheduled_tribes.pdf\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400\">SC\/ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989<\/span><\/a><span style=\"font-weight: 400\">. In <\/span><a href=\"https:\/\/indiankanoon.org\/doc\/746591\/\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400\">E V Chinnaiah v. State of Andhra Pradesh<\/span><\/a><span style=\"font-weight: 400\"> (2005), the court emphasized the rigidity of SC classification under Article 341.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400\">In <\/span><a href=\"https:\/\/indiankanoon.org\/doc\/1215698\/\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400\">Chandramohanan<\/span><\/a><span style=\"font-weight: 400\"> (2004), it reiterated that statutory protections cannot extend beyond those recognised under the 1950 Order. This creates a legal paradox: caste-based violence may persist, but victims are denied protection because the law no longer recognizes their caste identity.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400\">International human rights law offers a different approach. Instruments such as the <\/span><a href=\"https:\/\/www.ohchr.org\/en\/instruments-mechanisms\/instruments\/international-covenant-civil-and-political-rights\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400\">ICCPR<\/span><\/a><span style=\"font-weight: 400\"> and <\/span><a href=\"https:\/\/www.ohchr.org\/en\/instruments-mechanisms\/instruments\/international-convention-elimination-all-forms-racial\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400\">CERD<\/span><\/a><span style=\"font-weight: 400\"> emphasize equality and prohibit discrimination based on descent, interpreted to include caste. These frameworks prioritize lived disadvantage rather than formal religious identity.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400\">In the United States, affirmative action is anchored in race and historical disadvantage, not religion. South Africa\u2019s jurisprudence similarly prioritizes substantive equality. India\u2019s religion-linked approach to caste recognition thus stands out as an exception.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400\">The persistence of caste across religions presents a challenge that the current legal framework struggles to address. Delinking SC status from religion, as recommended by the <\/span><a href=\"https:\/\/www.minorityaffairs.gov.in\/WriteReadData\/RTF1984\/1658830363.pdf\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400\">Mishra Commission<\/span><\/a><span style=\"font-weight: 400\">, would be one path forward. Alternatively, a parallel framework for Dalit converts could be devised. What is clear is that the status quo is increasingly difficult to justify \u2013 constitutionally, empirically, and morally.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400\">The Supreme Court may be correct in its interpretation of the law as it stands. But the law itself appears increasingly misaligned with the realities it governs. An \u201cabsolute bar\u201d offers doctrinal clarity, but at the cost of substantive justice.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400\">If caste does not disappear upon conversion, the constitution cannot afford to pretend that it does. The real question, then, is not whether the court has interpreted the law correctly, but whether the law, in its present form, remains defensible.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><i><span style=\"font-weight: 400\">Originally published under <\/span><\/i><a href=\"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by\/4.0\/\"><i><span style=\"font-weight: 400\">Creative Commons<\/span><\/i><\/a><i><span style=\"font-weight: 400\"> by <\/span><\/i><a href=\"https:\/\/360info.org\/\"><i><span style=\"font-weight: 400\">360info<\/span><\/i><\/a><i><span style=\"font-weight: 400\">\u2122.<\/span><\/i><\/p>\n<\/section>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Compared to affirmative action in the U.S. and South Africa, India\u2019s religion-linked approach to caste recognition stands out as an exception. Credit: Wikimedia Commons \/ Zhengan When India\u2019s Supreme Court reiterated that the exclusion of Dalit converts from Scheduled Caste (SC) status is \u201cabsolute and admits no exception,\u201d it did more than settle a doctrinal [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":957,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[1],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-956","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-uncategorized"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO plugin v28.2 - https:\/\/yoast.com\/product\/yoast-seo-wordpress\/ -->\n<title>Rethinking the \u2018Absolute Bar\u2019 on Scheduled Caste Status in India - Asia Newscast<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.asianewscast.com\/?p=956\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Rethinking the \u2018Absolute Bar\u2019 on Scheduled Caste Status in India - Asia Newscast\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Compared to affirmative action in the U.S. and South Africa, India\u2019s religion-linked approach to caste recognition stands out as an exception. Credit: Wikimedia Commons \/ Zhengan When India\u2019s Supreme Court reiterated that the exclusion of Dalit converts from Scheduled Caste (SC) status is \u201cabsolute and admits no exception,\u201d it did more than settle a doctrinal [&hellip;]\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.asianewscast.com\/?p=956\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Asia Newscast\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2026-05-29T03:32:22+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.asianewscast.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/05\/thediplomat_2026-05-28-235618-ALU9JP.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"600\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"360\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"ANC News Desk\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"ANC News Desk\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"6 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.asianewscast.com\\\/?p=956#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.asianewscast.com\\\/?p=956\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"ANC News Desk\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.asianewscast.com\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/2c9f588ee00d3b2b92133babac793e30\"},\"headline\":\"Rethinking the \u2018Absolute Bar\u2019 on Scheduled Caste Status in India\",\"datePublished\":\"2026-05-29T03:32:22+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.asianewscast.com\\\/?p=956\"},\"wordCount\":1116,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.asianewscast.com\\\/#organization\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.asianewscast.com\\\/?p=956#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.asianewscast.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2026\\\/05\\\/thediplomat_2026-05-28-235618-ALU9JP.jpg\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.asianewscast.com\\\/?p=956\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.asianewscast.com\\\/?p=956\",\"name\":\"Rethinking the \u2018Absolute Bar\u2019 on Scheduled Caste Status in India - Asia Newscast\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.asianewscast.com\\\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.asianewscast.com\\\/?p=956#primaryimage\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.asianewscast.com\\\/?p=956#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.asianewscast.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2026\\\/05\\\/thediplomat_2026-05-28-235618-ALU9JP.jpg\",\"datePublished\":\"2026-05-29T03:32:22+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.asianewscast.com\\\/?p=956#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.asianewscast.com\\\/?p=956\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.asianewscast.com\\\/?p=956#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.asianewscast.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2026\\\/05\\\/thediplomat_2026-05-28-235618-ALU9JP.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.asianewscast.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2026\\\/05\\\/thediplomat_2026-05-28-235618-ALU9JP.jpg\",\"width\":600,\"height\":360},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.asianewscast.com\\\/?p=956#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.asianewscast.com\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Rethinking the \u2018Absolute Bar\u2019 on Scheduled Caste Status in India\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.asianewscast.com\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.asianewscast.com\\\/\",\"name\":\"Asia Newscast\",\"description\":\"\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.asianewscast.com\\\/#organization\"},\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.asianewscast.com\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.asianewscast.com\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Asia Newscast\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.asianewscast.com\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.asianewscast.com\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.asianewscast.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2026\\\/08\\\/anc-logo-v3.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.asianewscast.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2026\\\/08\\\/anc-logo-v3.jpg\",\"width\":1280,\"height\":853,\"caption\":\"Asia Newscast\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.asianewscast.com\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"}},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.asianewscast.com\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/2c9f588ee00d3b2b92133babac793e30\",\"name\":\"ANC News Desk\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/77de746d543b5ff4f56d09fd6ad80cbe60a27662c69f5f6c30f6ef847060400f?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/77de746d543b5ff4f56d09fd6ad80cbe60a27662c69f5f6c30f6ef847060400f?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/77de746d543b5ff4f56d09fd6ad80cbe60a27662c69f5f6c30f6ef847060400f?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"ANC News Desk\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/asianewscast.com\"],\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.asianewscast.com\\\/?author=1\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Rethinking the \u2018Absolute Bar\u2019 on Scheduled Caste Status in India - Asia Newscast","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.asianewscast.com\/?p=956","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Rethinking the \u2018Absolute Bar\u2019 on Scheduled Caste Status in India - Asia Newscast","og_description":"Compared to affirmative action in the U.S. and South Africa, India\u2019s religion-linked approach to caste recognition stands out as an exception. Credit: Wikimedia Commons \/ Zhengan When India\u2019s Supreme Court reiterated that the exclusion of Dalit converts from Scheduled Caste (SC) status is \u201cabsolute and admits no exception,\u201d it did more than settle a doctrinal [&hellip;]","og_url":"https:\/\/www.asianewscast.com\/?p=956","og_site_name":"Asia Newscast","article_published_time":"2026-05-29T03:32:22+00:00","og_image":[{"width":600,"height":360,"url":"https:\/\/www.asianewscast.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/05\/thediplomat_2026-05-28-235618-ALU9JP.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"ANC News Desk","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"ANC News Desk","Est. reading time":"6 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.asianewscast.com\/?p=956#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.asianewscast.com\/?p=956"},"author":{"name":"ANC News Desk","@id":"https:\/\/www.asianewscast.com\/#\/schema\/person\/2c9f588ee00d3b2b92133babac793e30"},"headline":"Rethinking the \u2018Absolute Bar\u2019 on Scheduled Caste Status in India","datePublished":"2026-05-29T03:32:22+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.asianewscast.com\/?p=956"},"wordCount":1116,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.asianewscast.com\/#organization"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.asianewscast.com\/?p=956#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/www.asianewscast.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/05\/thediplomat_2026-05-28-235618-ALU9JP.jpg","inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.asianewscast.com\/?p=956","url":"https:\/\/www.asianewscast.com\/?p=956","name":"Rethinking the \u2018Absolute Bar\u2019 on Scheduled Caste Status in India - Asia Newscast","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.asianewscast.com\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.asianewscast.com\/?p=956#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.asianewscast.com\/?p=956#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/www.asianewscast.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/05\/thediplomat_2026-05-28-235618-ALU9JP.jpg","datePublished":"2026-05-29T03:32:22+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.asianewscast.com\/?p=956#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.asianewscast.com\/?p=956"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.asianewscast.com\/?p=956#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/www.asianewscast.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/05\/thediplomat_2026-05-28-235618-ALU9JP.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.asianewscast.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/05\/thediplomat_2026-05-28-235618-ALU9JP.jpg","width":600,"height":360},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.asianewscast.com\/?p=956#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.asianewscast.com\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Rethinking the \u2018Absolute Bar\u2019 on Scheduled Caste Status in India"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.asianewscast.com\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.asianewscast.com\/","name":"Asia Newscast","description":"","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.asianewscast.com\/#organization"},"potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.asianewscast.com\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.asianewscast.com\/#organization","name":"Asia Newscast","url":"https:\/\/www.asianewscast.com\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.asianewscast.com\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.asianewscast.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/08\/anc-logo-v3.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.asianewscast.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/08\/anc-logo-v3.jpg","width":1280,"height":853,"caption":"Asia Newscast"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.asianewscast.com\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"}},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.asianewscast.com\/#\/schema\/person\/2c9f588ee00d3b2b92133babac793e30","name":"ANC News Desk","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/77de746d543b5ff4f56d09fd6ad80cbe60a27662c69f5f6c30f6ef847060400f?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/77de746d543b5ff4f56d09fd6ad80cbe60a27662c69f5f6c30f6ef847060400f?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/77de746d543b5ff4f56d09fd6ad80cbe60a27662c69f5f6c30f6ef847060400f?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"ANC News Desk"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/asianewscast.com"],"url":"https:\/\/www.asianewscast.com\/?author=1"}]}},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.asianewscast.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/956","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.asianewscast.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.asianewscast.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.asianewscast.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.asianewscast.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=956"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.asianewscast.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/956\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.asianewscast.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/media\/957"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.asianewscast.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=956"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.asianewscast.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=956"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.asianewscast.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=956"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}